TEFL
Reflection on the Article “Hands-on” or “Head-Trip”….. How do you learn best? by Susan. L. Colantuono
(817 words)
Having read Susan L. Colantuono’s “Hands-on” or “Head-Trip”: How Do You Learn Best?, this reflection examines the relationship between the article’s discussion of learning and an experience I had during my SIT TESOL course. Colantuono’s article explores different approaches to learning and presents a four-stage learning process through which learners can experience, reflect upon, conceptualise, and subsequently apply their learning in new situations. I found that a German language lesson delivered by one of my SIT instructors provided a useful example of this learning process in practice.
Today was the first day of my SIT TESOL course, during which our class participated in two German language lessons. During the first lesson, I felt that I was not contributing sufficiently and questioned my level of intellectual engagement. My initial impression was that the lesson felt somewhat flat and lacked the interest, emotion, and excitement that I personally associate with an effective learning experience. However, when I heard the responses of other members of the class, I realised that their perceptions were quite different. Several people described the lesson as amusing and enjoyable. This contrast in perspectives prompted me to consider how differently individuals can respond to the same learning experience, which corresponds with Colantuono’s discussion of different approaches to learning.
Initially, I felt somewhat isolated by the difference between my response and those of my classmates. When another SIT instructor invited us to reflect on the lesson, I commented that I felt “the language learning experience is a long road.” In retrospect, I recognise that this was a relatively negative interpretation of the experience. Although my response was a genuine reflection of how I felt at the time, listening to the more positive reactions of my peers encouraged me to reconsider my own attitude and expectations.
The second German lesson provided an opportunity to apply this reflection. I felt more engaged and involved in the learning process. I wrote more extensively in my notebook, practised more both independently and with my partner, and listened with greater concentration. I also noticed that I was able to use some of the language and materials introduced during the first lesson. This suggested to me that the initial experience had not been unsuccessful; rather, I had perhaps not engaged with it as effectively as I could have. By reflecting on my experience, I began to consider how I could approach the subsequent lesson differently.
Colantuono’s four stages of learning provide a useful framework for understanding this process. The first stage, “concrete experience,” can be understood as my direct participation in the first German lesson. I experienced the lesson without initially analysing my response to it in depth. The second stage, “observation and reflection,” occurred when I considered why I had not gained as much from the lesson as I had expected. I began to question whether my lack of enthusiasm had influenced my perception of the experience.
The third stage, “abstract concepts,” encouraged me to consider possible explanations for my response. Was my reaction primarily related to my own attitude and expectations, or were there aspects of the teaching approach that contributed to my lack of engagement? For example, I considered whether the repetition used by the instructor had affected my enjoyment of the lesson. However, rather than attributing my response entirely to the teacher, I recognised that my own attitude was also an important factor.
The fourth stage, “concepts in new situations,” became particularly relevant when I listened to other members of the class describe the same lesson as enjoyable and amusing. Their responses challenged my initial interpretation and encouraged me to consider changing my approach to the next lesson. From this reflection, I developed what could be understood as a hypothesis for my subsequent learning: if I approached the next lesson with greater concentration, participation, and openness, I might have a more positive and productive learning experience. My experience in the second lesson suggested that this hypothesis had some validity.
This experience has demonstrated to me that learning is not solely determined by the content or delivery of a lesson. The learner’s attitude, expectations, level of engagement, and willingness to reflect can also influence the learning experience. While teaching methods are undoubtedly important, learners have a degree of responsibility for how they respond to and engage with those methods.
Overall, reading Colantuono’s article has encouraged me to view my experience more critically and constructively. Rather than simply deciding that a lesson was ineffective or attributing my response entirely to the instructor, I was able to step back, reflect on my experience, consider alternative explanations, and adapt my approach. This process of reflection enabled me to enter the second lesson with greater focus and engagement. For me, this illustrates the value of reflective practice in learning: an experience that initially appears negative can become a valuable opportunity for learning when it is examined critically and used to inform future practice.
Teaching Young Learners – Games and Puzzles
TASK
Choose a language item from the list below and design a simple lesson plan using one of the games to teach/practice the item.
Student Vocabulary Game
Number of players: 2-6
Age: 6+
Materials: A score/category sheet per group, a deck of alphabet cards and a pencil
Object of the game: To name objects beginning with the chosen alphabet card and to be the first person to get rid of his/her alphabet cards.
| Player name: |
| 1, Toys: |
| 2. Fruits and Vegetables: |
| 3. The Classroom: |
| 4. Things in the home: |
| 5. The Body: |
| 6. Boy’s and Girl’s Names: |
| 7. Sports and Hobbies |
| 8. Animals/Pets |
| Score: |
1) A Student shuffles the cards and deals 5 alphabet cards. The cards are laid face down in front of each player.
2) The remaining alphabet cards are laid face down on the table in front of the group.
3) Alternate people start but the first player to the dealer’s left starts play by turning over their alphabet card, and then naming something from the first category on the sheet beginning with his letter. Once the learner has said a word they must write it on their sheet. Their go is over.
4) They have 10 seconds to think of an answer, if they do not have an answer in the allotted time they must pick up an extra card from the middle of the table and place it face down in front of them. Their go is over.
5) Each student takes turns to turn an alphabet card from their pile and naming an item in the first category. Examples are not allowed to be repeated.
6) The round ends when someone has picked up all their cards and named something from the category each time.
7) The other students must add up how many remaining cards they have, and write that number on their score sheet, e.g. 3 cards remaining = 3 points
8) The process is repeated with the person to the left of the dealer being the new dealer and the person to their left starting the new game. The game continues with objects from the second category.
9) The games continue until all the 8 categories have been completed
10) The person with the lowest score is the winner.
Workshop Title: SWBAT (student will be able to..)
(471 words)
After the workshop, please take a few minutes to jot down any ideas, teaching tips or techniques, etc that were covered, and which you felt were useful to you. How was the content of the workshop relevant to the courses that you teach? What did you gain from attending this session?
The main point I got from this workshop was about having objectives in my lessons. If I do not have objectives, and objectives that I want the students to achieve the lesson does not really have a flow and a definite conclusion. Sometimes a teacher can go through the exercise book and feel they have achieved their quota of the language learning book but has not really focused on the students achieving a goal for that lesson which is to be using the vocabulary, grammar and language speaking associated with that lesson.
I think what I got from this workshop was to be more focused on the students’ needs, their use of English language and achieving goals. The workshop made me think more about the book I use. I recognized more how the Interchange book is structured into cycles. This is that the students have a snapshot, conversation, grammar focus, and listening to assist them with their learning and thus at the end of the cycle, it should give them a freer practice to make sure they can use their newly acquired English language.
For myself, I try to get as much as I can out of each English language lesson I teach. With the information I have been given by the workshop host, I see our team of teachers are finding their way to the end of a cycle. However, there may be a question about objectives being reached for each student. I think from what the workshop talked about is that teachers should try to focus more on students’ objectives. This is the acronym SWBATs. The crux of the workshop was Students Will Be Able To’.
I think SWBAT is a focal point for me. I should be able at the end of the cycle in the book as well as the end of each lesson be able to see and hear the students using the grammar and vocabulary which I have been teaching them, hopefully without major problems. I need to know that each student knew their objectives at the start, worked through the class and hopefully achieved them by the end.
To conclude, what I took from the workshop was that teachers should remember to focus on their objectives while giving students objectives, so in the end there is a purpose to the lesson and a feeling of achievement. Thus, all students will achieve their goal of ‘students will be able to’. and teacher will be asking each other, ‘what are your SWBATs for today’s class?
Why is it important to teach a second language?
(413 words)
TASKS:
- There are at least 3000 spoken languages in existence today. T/F
This is true, it has been estimated that the peoples of the world speak at least 3,000 or more different languages although it can be estimated that there are as many as 10,000.
2. Chinese is the most widely spoken language in the world. T/F
This is true, with 400 million people speaking Chinese (Mandarin), although If the English language is included with its second language use then this would be the most widely spoken language.
3. Some countries have more than one official language. T/F
This is true of some countries that are made up of many peoples. They speak different languages. For example, Switzerland has four national languages – German, French, Italian, and Romansch with German existing in two major dialects. Belgium counts French and Flemish. Canada has two official languages, English and French.
4. Bionic and laser are words that have been in the English language for more than 100 years. T/F
This is false. One specific feature of English is the ease with which new words can be introduced or formed to meet the communication needs of science, popular culture, politics, administration and ordinary speech. The two examples ‘Laser’ and ‘bionic’ are recently adopted words. It can be seen that the English language has an exterior that is forever changing but the core stays the same. An example of this peripheral evolvement of the English language is shown by there being every year a new buzzword (“a word or expression from a particular subject area that has become fashionable because it has been used a lot especially on television and in the newspapers”). The buzzword for 2004 was ‘Chav’. This is a noun which describes young men who wear cheap gold jewellery and baseball caps and hang around in shopping centres all over Britain.
5. English is widely used as an international language in science, commerce academic study, and training. T/F
There are many nations whose unique languages are spoken by no more than a few million people. This is the case with several countries of Europe such as the Scandinavian countries, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Holland, and part of Belgium. For these kinds of countries simply to have a large enough market for publication, many books especially scientific, technical, or academic are printed in English. For them, English has become the dominant international language in communications, science, business, aviation, entertainment, and diplomacy and also on the Internet.
