Literature
‘Satire is concerned with the gulf between our human frailties and the excellence to which we aspire.’ Discuss this comment in relation to Henry Fielding’s Joseph Andrews.
Henry Fielding’s The History of the Adventures of Joseph Andrews, and of His Friend Mr Abraham Adams is fundamentally concerned with the gap between how people perceive themselves and how they behave in reality. Through satire, Fielding exposes the weaknesses, hypocrisies and absurdities of individuals who believe themselves to be honourable and morally superior. The novel began, in part, as a parody of Samuel Richardson’s Pamela, mocking what Fielding regarded as the smug virtue and excessive moralising of Richardson’s characters and narrative. However, Joseph Andrews develops beyond simple parody. Fielding uses satire to examine the moral and social divisions of eighteenth-century England, particularly the contrast between social status and genuine virtue.
The novel repeatedly questions whether people who occupy positions of social or moral authority actually possess the qualities they claim to represent. Joseph, in contrast, is a young and relatively inexperienced footman of humble origins. Fielding challenges the assumption that social status determines a person’s worth when he asks, in relation to Joseph, whether a person “who hath no ancestors should therefore be rendered incapable of acquiring honour?” This question is central to the novel because Fielding repeatedly demonstrates that genuine virtue does not necessarily belong to those with wealth, education or social position. Instead, individuals who regard themselves as morally superior are frequently exposed as hypocritical, selfish or ridiculous.
Fielding therefore uses Joseph as an important contrast to many of the characters he encounters. Joseph is handsome, naïve and inexperienced, but he attempts to maintain his principles even when doing so places him at a disadvantage. At the beginning of the novel, he works as a stable boy for Sir Thomas Booby. After Sir Thomas’s death, Joseph becomes the object of unwanted sexual attention from his widow, Lady Booby, and from her servant, Mrs Slipslop. Like Richardson’s Pamela, Joseph resists the attempts of a socially superior employer to compromise his chastity. His refusal ultimately results in his dismissal and expulsion from the household.
This situation allows Fielding to explore the idea of moral excellence through comedy. Joseph’s commitment to chastity is admirable, but Fielding does not present him as an entirely conventional heroic figure. His innocence and lack of experience can also make him appear naïve and even absurd. Consequently, the reader is encouraged to recognise that moral virtue is not always straightforward or attractive. Fielding’s satire creates a tension between Joseph’s genuine goodness and the sometimes ridiculous way in which he expresses it. The reader is therefore encouraged not simply to admire Joseph but also to examine their own assumptions about morality, virtue and appropriate behaviour.
This becomes particularly evident during Joseph’s journey to Somerset. After being robbed and stripped naked by highwaymen, he is left beside the road. When a coach arrives, the passengers are presented with an opportunity to demonstrate compassion. Instead, they become preoccupied with their own concerns. The coachman wants to continue because he is in a hurry, while the lady is uncomfortable with the situation and orders the coachman to drive on. Joseph’s desperate appeal for assistance therefore becomes almost farcical. The situation is morally serious, yet the responses of those around him are so selfish and absurd that the episode becomes comic.
The episode demonstrates one of the central purposes of Fielding’s satire: it exposes the difference between moral obligation and social self-interest. The passengers appear respectable, but their actions reveal a lack of genuine compassion. Even the representative of the law becomes more concerned with the possible consequences of helping Joseph than with Joseph’s immediate suffering. Fielding therefore exposes a society in which people make moral decisions according to their social position, personal convenience and fear of consequences rather than according to principles of charity and justice. Joseph is eventually given a coat, but only after considerable hesitation and debate. The absurdity of the situation makes the reader laugh, while simultaneously encouraging them to recognise the cruelty underlying the comedy.
Joseph’s experiences introduce him to a wide range of characters who embody different forms of human frailty. He encounters highwaymen, sexual predators, hypocritical clergymen, dishonest innkeepers, practical jokers, bullies, biased magistrates and lying witnesses. Fielding also contrasts people of high social status with those considered socially inferior. Those with power frequently exploit or dismiss people beneath them, while those of lower status sometimes behave with greater generosity and humanity. Through these encounters, the novel becomes more than a parody of Pamela. Its satire becomes a wider examination of eighteenth-century English society and its moral values.
The contrast between appearance and reality is therefore essential to Fielding’s satirical method. The question throughout the novel is not simply who appears respectable, but who is genuinely virtuous. Fielding repeatedly asks the reader to consider who is truly charitable, chaste, just, knowledgeable and honourable, and who merely possesses the reputation of being so. Social position provides no guarantee of moral excellence. Indeed, the higher a person’s position, the greater the hypocrisy can sometimes appear when their behaviour fails to match the standards they claim to represent.
Joseph’s development also contributes to Fielding’s exploration of human frailty. As his experiences accumulate, he becomes wiser and more capable of dealing with difficult situations. Importantly, his nature does not fundamentally change. Instead, he gradually learns to respond to circumstances with greater maturity and less naïveté. His relationship with Parson Adams is particularly important in this development. Adams acts as both companion and guide, and their experiences together allow Joseph to develop his understanding of the world.
However, Fielding does not make Joseph a completely serious moral hero. His tone-deafness, innocence and occasional inability to recognise what is appropriate in a particular situation remain sources of comedy. Joseph’s moral principles are admirable, but his inability to navigate social situations always leaves room for satire. In this respect, Fielding avoids presenting virtue as perfection. Even a fundamentally good person can possess weaknesses, misunderstandings and limitations.
This is important in relation to the statement that satire is concerned with “the gulf between our human frailties and the excellence to which we aspire.” Fielding’s characters frequently aspire to qualities such as honour, chastity, charity, justice and social respectability, yet their behaviour reveals how difficult it is to achieve these ideals. Lady Booby considers herself respectable but behaves selfishly and sexually aggressively towards Joseph. The passengers on the coach appear respectable but fail to demonstrate basic compassion. Clergymen and representatives of authority can claim moral superiority while behaving hypocritically. Through these contradictions, Fielding demonstrates that the distance between moral aspiration and actual behaviour is often the source of both comedy and criticism.
Ultimately, Joseph Andrews suggests that human beings are imperfect and that genuine moral excellence requires more than a respectable appearance or elevated social position. Fielding uses satire to expose the weaknesses of individuals and institutions while encouraging his readers to reflect upon their own assumptions and behaviour. The novel’s humour therefore has a serious moral purpose. We laugh at the foolishness and hypocrisy of Fielding’s characters, but the satire also invites us to recognise our own capacity for error, selfishness and moral weakness.
The central opposition in Joseph Andrews is therefore between appearance and reality. Those who appear respectable are not necessarily virtuous, while those considered socially inferior may demonstrate greater humanity and integrity. Fielding’s satire reveals the uncomfortable distance between the people we believe ourselves to be and the people our actions reveal us to be. In doing so, Joseph Andrews illustrates the quotation effectively: satire exposes the gulf between human frailty and the moral excellence to which people aspire, allowing the reader to laugh at human weakness while also being encouraged to examine it in themselves.
The Setting of “Volpone” and “Much Ado About Nothing”
(906 Words)
The settings of Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing and Jonson’s Volpone are both situated within Italian contexts, a significant choice given the reputation of Italy, and particularly Venice, within the English cultural imagination. For early modern English audiences, Italy represented “the very acme of beauty and culture, of licence and corruption.” Venice, in particular, was imagined as one of the most fabulous and wealthy Italian cities, associated simultaneously with commercial prosperity, cultural sophistication, sexual licence, political intrigue, and moral corruption. Its reputation for licentiousness was accompanied by an equally prominent reputation for severe justice. The catastrophe of Volpone, therefore, reflects not only Jonson’s strenuous moral concerns but also contemporary English perceptions of Venetian justice and punishment. Similarly, Shakespeare incorporates aspects of contemporary Venetian society into his imaginative construction of Messina, particularly its social structures, values, and patterns of behaviour.
Venice was a leading commercial power in Shakespeare’s period and, like the Messina represented in Much Ado About Nothing, was understood as a materially prosperous city in which participation in elaborate social entertainments, including masquerades, formed part of elite culture. The association of Venice with wealth, vice, jealousy, intrigue, and cruelty consequently made it an appropriate setting for Jonson’s comedy. Jonson’s careful construction of the Venetian setting in Volpone anticipates the precision with which he would later establish the urban environments of his London comedies. Venice was widely represented in Elizabethan culture as a centre of intrigue and deception, a place in which outsiders were particularly vulnerable to exploitation by its supposedly sophisticated inhabitants. Messina similarly functions as a society characterised by plots, schemes, and competing forms of deception. While some of these manoeuvres are benign or comic in intention, others are motivated by malice and self-interest. Beneath the apparent harmony of Messina, therefore, there remains a persistent sense that something is fundamentally unstable within the social order.
The deliberate construction of the setting in Volpone functions simultaneously as symbol, theme, and principle of dramatic unity and tension. Setting is consequently structural rather than merely ornamental in Jonson’s play. The severity of the play’s conclusion expresses Jonson’s moral response to the values associated with Venice and to the corrupt social world that the city represents. A comparable concern with political and social order can be identified in Much Ado About Nothing. Don Pedro explains that, despite Don John’s attempt to overthrow his authority, the two brothers have been reconciled. Such a resolution is striking when considered against the political assumptions of Elizabethan society, in which threats to legitimate political authority by usurpers were conventionally understood to demand severe punishment. The presence of a defeated enemy of the state moving freely among the citizens of Messina might otherwise have suggested weakness within the political body. Shakespeare’s decision to minimise the political consequences of Don John’s rebellion is therefore significant: rather than treating rebellion as an enduring political crisis, the play ultimately absorbs it into the comic restoration of social harmony.
The action of both plays is also geographically restricted, and this spatial limitation contributes significantly to their dramatic structures. In Volpone, Jonson establishes a technique that he would develop throughout his career: concentrating his comedies within a sharply defined and carefully conceived section of an urban environment. The care with which the majority of the scenes in Volpone are situated around the centre of Venice suggests that Jonson conceived the action within a deliberately narrow geographical framework. This concentration creates a sense of enclosure that intensifies the characters’ interactions and allows the city itself to become an active component of the drama.
Messina functions similarly as a contained social and political environment. It is a comparatively weak patriarchy, vulnerable to intrigue, disorder, and the disruption of established hierarchies, while figures such as Dogberry are entrusted with the responsibility of maintaining public order. The inadequacy of this authority contributes to the play’s comic treatment of disorder. Significantly, once Don Pedro has explained his “reconciliation” with Don John, the play offers little further discussion of the rebellion that Don John has presumably initiated. Instead, war, including the possibility of civil conflict, is treated by the victors and their hosts as a largely gentlemanly pursuit: a form of competition through which individuals can demonstrate their courage and social distinction rather than a sustained political crisis. This treatment reinforces the play’s broader tendency to transform potentially serious threats to social order into comic mechanisms through which harmony can ultimately be restored.
In both Volpone and Much Ado About Nothing, therefore, setting provides more than a backdrop for the action. Jonson’s carefully constructed Venice supplies a framework through which corruption, deception, justice, and moral disorder can be explored, while Shakespeare’s Messina provides a similarly contained social environment in which deception, gender relations, political authority, and communal order are negotiated. In Volpone, the specificity of the Venetian setting creates the tensions, atmosphere, and structural unity associated with Jonson’s mature comedy. Beyond creating a sense of geographical immediacy for the audience, Jonson’s deliberate use of setting unifies and intensifies the action, reinforces the symbolic significance of spatial relationships, and contributes directly to the play’s meaning. Shakespeare’s Messina operates in a comparable manner: its restricted social world enables the play to contain political and interpersonal disorder within a comic framework and ultimately to restore communal harmony. In both plays, therefore, setting is fundamentally structural, shaping not only where the action occurs but also the thematic tensions, social relationships, and moral meanings through which the dramas unfold.
A&P Themes by John Updike
Once you read John Updike’s short supermarket story you are hit by many different themes. A reader could say it is the decadence of the girls who go against society’s norms by wearing their bikinis in the supermarket; there is also Sammy, a shop worker, who could well have made a rash and stupid decision to leave his job. Both of these themes are justified, although I believe that the main theme in this passage involves how mundane life can be. This is shown in the supermarket which is turned upside down with the entrance of the three scantly clad girls.
Within the first paragraph, the reader gets an idea of the two worlds Sammy is faced with. On the one hand Sammy has a welcome female distraction that he can not keep his eyes off, as he rings up the same product twice on the cash register. This is contrasted by the lady he is serving, as we find out she is a ‘witch’ of about fifty who sees his mistake and gives him ‘hell’. Sammy rudely comments that she would notice the mistake, as she had been doing week in week out for forty years.
Sammy alludes further to the dullness of the supermarket when he refers to the shoppers as ‘sheep pushing carts down the aisles’ and how they walk around the shop following each other, even though there are no one-way signs. Of course, the girls clash with this almost robotic movement of the shoppers by going against the flow of traffic.
Furthermore, we find the manager with some decisions to make. Sammy comments that he is a ‘pretty dreary’ figure. The manager does not help alleviate the mundane feel of this place, as his attitude to the girls does not raise a smile on his face. He comes straight out and tells them ‘this isn’t a beach’ He gives them a ‘sad superintendent stare’ as he reprimands them for not being decently dressed. We again see Sammy’s contrast to the situation, as he raises a smile which his manager notices and does not like. The manager compounds his dull attitude by commenting to the girls that it is the ‘company policy’.
Finally, the boredom and monotony of the supermarket is ultimately shown as Sammy quits his job. The experience of the day has told Sammy to seek a more interesting profession.
(Words 397)
