History

History of Power and How it Shapes the World

Posted on Updated on

(1126 Words)

So long as people have power, so long as people under no circumstances change their attitude, history will be the same and repeat itself over and over. War will always be seen as a venture for peace, be it started through the power of religion, power of kings, or by the powers of countries. In this essay, I would like to make a comment on aspects involved in three movies I have recently seen. These are King Henry VIII, set in the 16th century, Les Miserable, set around the time of the French Revolution, and Good Morning Vietnam which was set during the Vietnam War in 1965. They all depict forces attacking each other. We identify that everyone has a motive, but only in their eyes are they right but for what good? All three films show power can work in many ways. The will of governments, royalty, and religion can not be stopped and those who try to stop them can get hurt.

To begin with, King Henry VIII had the power of an empire trying to change his country. King Henry wanted to get re-married. The powers of religious Rome denied him. We see from the movie that the Roman Catholic Church was very powerful in England.  Henry VIII, powerful as he was, was not happy that he was told he could not do what he wanted. For a man in control of a country, this seemed like lighting the blue touch paper. Henry started to question why his country should allow someone else to have so much power when he had so much power himself.  We find out that he conceived a plan that would not only take care of the divorce but also help in creating England as a sovereign nation state. The power would then be wholly in England’s hands. Henry had the power to change the religion in his country and banish the Catholic Church from England. Rome thought they had the power to tell Henry what to do. Henry, being a religious man, believed he was one down from God. Whatever he did, it was a message from God. This belief in power stretched the imagination to its fullest. Henry started to question why his country should allow someone else to have so much power. If he broke with the Roman Catholic Church he would win many Protestant friends and have more power in England. These two powers clash and as such we end up with Henry VIII having his own church and Catholicism banished from England. Henry VII, in many respects, gave himself more power.

Furthermore in the movie ‘Good Morning Vietnam’ we see the power of The West, being America, against the East, Russia, in a power struggle of politics. The Soviets feared capitalism and U.S. feared communism. America became involved a war, not of their making and on another continent, to prevent North Vietnam from taking over the South with communism. We see American soldiers in the jungle because of their country’s main world policy of preventing the spread of communism by any means necessary. As we see the main character shows laughter through pain, we recognize this as one of America’s most tragic times. The power and will of each government outweigh the destruction seen on the ground where soldiers will be scared for life. We wonder why America would spend so much money and use their military power on a war that was not theirs and put these poor soldiers through hell. Of course, the reasons are that The United States entered the war to prevent takeover and as part of their wider strategy of containment. Within this war, we recognize the superpowers of these two countries America and Russia as they lead rival groups of countries in the world, which represent different social and economic systems. They had the money and power to do it. America at that time (and pretty much in today’s world) perceived themselves as the protectors of the globe from any threat to them.

Continuing our theme of power, the third film ‘Les Miserables’ although set after the French Revolution, for the purposes of this essay we can define a period around and after the revolution as the insurrection in France. We are still drawn into a time of change that had the power of the people and the power of the kings and nobles. We recognise a time when new ideas about the power of the people start to take hold. The influence of the Enlightenment which celebrated science and reason over faith and religion can not be overestimated.  We know that political power in France was concentrated in very few hands. Sovereignty was no longer to rest with the monarch as a Divine Right, an appointment from God but rather with the people. Popular sovereignty now rested with the people and the idea of a Nation-State was conceived. In the movie, we are moved by the general destitution of people. France had the largest population in Europe and could not feed itself adequately. The French Revolution spawned the idea that everyone should be entitled to some principal rights. The French people were oppressed. The power of the French people has been shown throughout the world where support to revolutions that assert the right to self-determination.

To conclude, we see in all the films and aspects from them as history in the making. Why does the ‘French cause’ matter now?  There are still some governments that lack the support of a majority of their people and still use the power of terrorism to control their citizens. Places like Myanmar and North Korea live under a cloud or tyranny. Burma is a poor country, but the military regime is rich enough to expand its armed forces while news from impoverished North Korea tells you about their new weapon technologies. These countries ignore the past and seem to not learn from the experience of others. It is true that the past causes the present, and so the future. Henry VIII’s break from Rome had enormous consequences on English history not only in making it possible for the transformation of England into a powerful nation but also in the seizing of economic and political power from the Church. England now enjoys a secular state. America too has changed. The Vietnam War ended American innocence. It is recognized that no foreign war can succeed without that large domestic support. America’s democratic economy is the strongest in the world. It is a light that has seen many countries push towards democracy. Communism is finished. So, history helps us understand change and how the society we live in came to be. Many people have suffered because of change. Hopefully, from this, the world will learn.

.

Egalitarianism

Posted on Updated on

(425 words)

Egalitarianism highlights equal rights, so everyone is equal which means all of us recognizing other people’s plights and other people’s extremes.

Firstly, you have only got to look at this picture above from the protests in Bangkok. The multicolored group, neither red nor yellow, were trying to highlight the plight of the rural protester. They expressed they are not educated enough to accept democracy and the new rule of the new government. In many ways, it could be true. However, why are others just poking fun at them? In Thai society, shouldn’t everyone have equal rights and a right to a proper education? Why is there Elitist thinking? And, why is there such a divide? Society can never come together if people do not trust or respect the other.  

Furthermore, in Thailand where nearly half of the workforce are women, you can ask, do women have an equal role? Are there equal amounts of women and men in the Government? Although the Thai constitution specified that women and men have equal rights, the challenge is the gap between words and reality. We see that gender stereotypes usually prevail and traditional beliefs do not really change.

Secondly, look at the next picture below. What can you see? Who would you say is normally the abuser?

In our Utopian model, everyone would be seen as equal so the image as man the all-powerful being would hopefully weaken.

Finally, in all these examples, our egalitarian message here is to highlight the divide that many countries put themselves in that sees rich people in a country within which there are other citizens in abject poverty. Here, emphasizes a class divide that has no real hope of narrowing.  Education failing and Governments are slow to make real change. This is why we think a Utopian idea, where Governments either by way of tax, salary rise for the poor, create a climate where pop stars, TV stars, and basically half talented nobodies are put on a pedestal as idols and real people whose value has far more worth to society made to be heroes. It means methods do not let the rich get richer and richer without bearing some of the weight of a nation’s poverty. We can all live on an equal basis.

We can start to appreciate the better values and morals in society. We can further recognize male superiority has been an undeniable trait of humanity.

Hopefully, all this would create a society that helps those at the lower strata of life and supports progressive changes for women.

Egalitarianism

Posted on Updated on

I am not saying Egalitarianism is the best idea. We have got to have people who are better writers or sportsmen, for example. Thailand winning the world cup would be excellent. I would rather make you look at life, your country, and the world and put egalitarianism into context for its positive effects. Would you rather have a women pilot or a man? Why is it America still has never had a woman president? In an equal society, men are equal to women. So, there would be no violence against women.  John Locke, the famous philosopher, held the view that each person should have equal basic moral rights and natural rights. When you buy a house both the buyer and seller agree on a price, why can’t we do this with other things? Salaries, in modern democratic societies, we are talking about the greater degree of income that people have and trying to make it more equal.

How much did Hitler’s upbringing develop his stirrings of hatred and anger?

Posted on Updated on

(819 words)

In the multitude of years that humans have walked this planet, the German leader Adolf Hitler has to be one of the most evil people to ever come into existence. Not solely attributed, but largely as a consequence of Hitler, through his regime of Nazism, an estimated 11 million people were killed which included 6 million Jews. These are staggering figures but why so many Jews? Moreover, why did Hitler bring so much anger against the Jewish continuation as a people in his country and ultimately as a race?  Considering Hitler’s hatred of Jews, it is clear this vehemence was not born the day he became The Furher. Hitler’s young life experiences can be taken into consideration. He was a product of his early environment. His burgeoning disgust of the Jewish race and his anger materialized from three experiences; his father, his grandmother, and growing up.

Is there ‘Egalitarianism’ in this world? A few thoughts.

Posted on Updated on

(646 words)

Is equality the highest social value?

First of all, let’s give you the meaning of equality and egalitarianism. The dictionary says ‘equality’ is: The state or quality of being equal. Whereas, the dictionary says ‘of egalitarianism’: a social and political philosophy asserting the equality of all men, especially in their access to the rights and privileges of their society.

Question:

Can you think of any English premier league footballer and their salary?

Can you think of another occupation and their salary?

Who did you think of?

So, maybe you knew the first one and thought it was a high salary, but the second one not straight away and certainly not the same salary. The first footballer I thought of was Mohamad Salah. He is a premiership football player in England playing for Liverpool. My other thought was as a teacher. My first question to you would be about Salah’s salary? The second, how about a teacher?

How much do you think Salah earns?……

How much does a teacher earn?….

Salaries:

Well, it is reported Mohammad Salah’s salary is at 200,000 pounds a week. If I were to make a comparison with salaries, an example would be a starting salary of a teacher in England. This is between £25714 and £32157 a year. So, we see that Salah earns 7 or 8 times more a week than a new teacher in England does in a year. My question would be is this equality?

Teacher’s value:

So, what is a teacher’s value to society compared with a football player? Does the football player deserve to be put up in front of us as this idol and for kids to want to be like them? And, isn’t the teacher someone who bores us and keeps us from having fun all day? That may not be the case but I’m sure not many children enjoy going to school. Why do we not hold teachers up as idols?

Okay, another question for you.

What do you think of when I say the words Sydney, Australia?

Sun, beaches, sport, and shrimps on the barbies!

News Headline:

Now, if I said the newspaper headline “children found starving in Australia’” would you believe me? Many wouldn’t. The fact is there are children in remote indigenous communities who are starving.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/children-found-starving-in-rural-australia-2043566.html?action=Popup

Aborigines life:

Kathy Marks’ report in the Independent newspaper talks about rural Aborigines (the indigenous people) in Australia. The parents don’t work. Children hardly go to school. Children are left to wander at nighttime while their parents go and get drunk. In a situation so bad, a Red Cross style relief was needed. These are forgotten people. The Australian government spent more money on benefits, and so on, per aboriginal person than it did per non-aboriginal, but even so, there was still a huge amount of poverty and associated problems in aboriginal communities. A lot of aboriginal citizens still could not get the benefits they really need. Their trust in the Government and belief in getting out of their situation diminished leaving their children starving. We see the gap between Australians and the Aborigines as massive.

The point to these aspects of society I have just written about is to highlight inequality and the rights of people. Has the kind of society we live in now lost its values?

10 of each:

I could ask to you name 10 modern-day football players, pop stars, or movie stars. Then ask you to think of 10 well-known modern-day writers, world renowned teachers, or philosophers. I am sure the former question would be easier.

Value system:

It could be said that in most countries our value system these days sees aspects like wealth, power, and fame as number one, and real values like equal rights, peace, freedom and self-expression, and recognition of others pushed further down the ladder for progress.

So, will we all ever be considered equal?